Matmerk.no
SEO Site Score, overview, meta information, keywords consistency, whois data, backlinks counter, usability, page insights, mobile friendliness, speed tips for Matmerk.no
SEO Site Score, overview, meta information, keywords consistency, whois data, backlinks counter, usability, page insights, mobile friendliness, speed tips for Matmerk.no
<H1> | <H2> | <H3> | <H4> | <H5> | <H6> |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 0 |
<H1> Vi gjør det enkelt å velge norsk! </H1> |
<H2> Aktuelle saker </H2> |
<H3> Nominer kandidater til Ingrid Espelid Hovigs matkulturpris </H3> |
Stiftelsen Norsk Mat
matmerk.no/
Stiftelsen Norsk Mat
Text content size | 3949 bytes |
Total HTML size | 30031 bytes |
Domain Age: 10 Years, 254 Days
Created Date: 26th-Nov-2010
Updated Date: 27th-Jan-2021
Expiry Date: Not Available
% By looking up information in the domain registration directory |
% service, you confirm that you accept the terms and conditions of the |
% service: |
% https://www.norid.no/en/domeneoppslag/vilkar/ |
% |
Matmerk.no desktop website speed is medium range. Page speed is important for both search engines and visitors end.
Domains (TLD) | Status |
---|---|
matmerk.com | Available |
matmerk.net | Available |
matmerk.org | Available |
matmerk.biz | Already Registered |
matmerk.io | Already Registered |
Domains (TLD) | Status |
---|---|
natmerk.no | Available |
hatmerk.no | Available |
jatmerk.no | Available |
katmerk.no | Available |
latmerk.no | Available |
Matmerk.no mobile website speed is slow. Page speed is important for both search engines and visitors end.
Server IP | Server Location | Service Provider |
---|---|---|
194.63.248.52 | Belgium | Google Cloud |
Anchor | Type | Follow |
---|---|---|
http://matmerk.no/ | Internal Links | Dofollow |
https://www.matmerk.no/no/inn-pa-tunet | Internal Links | Dofollow |
Administration | Internal Links | Nofollow |
Logg inn KSL | External Links | Dofollow |
Om Stiftelsen Norsk Mat | External Links | Dofollow |
Social
Social Data
Cost and overhead previously rendered this semi-public form of communication unfeasible.
But advances in social networking technology from 2004-2010 has made broader concepts of sharing possible.